Many women have voiced their support for the reinstatement of pension programs and government assistance in lowering the cost of long-term care in retirement, given that they face a greater financial challenge.

80% of women have agreed that the U.S. is facing a retirement crisis, and an even larger percentage agreed that employers should be contributing a larger amount to workers’ retirement plans, as seen from the data from Greenwald Research and the National Institute on Retirement Security.

Since, on average, women still earn less than men, spend more time throughout their lives taking time from the workforce to be caregivers, and typically have a longer life expectancy, they have a higher hill to climb when it comes to retirement savings.

Dan Doonan, executive director of NIRS stated that “if policymakers are serious about improving the financial resilience of women, they’ll need to implement pragmatic retirement solutions that will help women shore up their retirement position.” He further went on to say, “Women clearly see increasing pension coverage as part of the retirement equation, and they want to see action now on Social Security.”

With various issues such as rising health care costs, rising inflation, debt, and fewer pensions, 76% of women believe that retirement is becoming more difficult overall, according to the NIRS. Of the women that were surveyed, 82% agree with the statement that “all workers should have access to a pension plan so they can be independent and self-reliant in retirement,” and 75% also agreed that “the disappearance of traditional pensions has made it harder for workers to achieve the American Dream.”

Someone will eventually contribute less to their retirement account with defined contribution plans if their income declines. For instance, in 2020, the Government Accountability Office stated that the annual contributions made by women to retirement accounts were around 30% less than those made by men.

According to NIRS’s analysis, defined benefit plans are likely more popular because they “take the complexity out of retirement.” Employees can count on a steady stream of income throughout retirement, and the plan sponsor oversees managing plan investments with qualified asset managers. There has been speculation that other firms may follow IBM’s announcement last year that it was reopening its cash balance pension plan and stopping its 401(k) matching contributions.

The NIRS also refers to a town council in Trumball, Connecticut that recently unanimously voted to reinstate pensions for their police officers to address workforce shortages that the council claimed resulted from the officers’ 2010 transition to a defined contribution plan. Due to the state’s alarming staffing shortage in critical public service delivery, legislators in Alaska are also working to restore pension benefits for public employees. The NIRS found that, overall, more than 80% of Americans with pension plans feel certain they will have pensions when they retire. Workers with 401(k) plans, however, were worried that the ups and downs in the stock market might affect their plan balances.

The NIRS also discovered that women are worried about long-term care costs in retirement. According to the study, 81% of women express concern about the expenses associated with long-term care and only 38% express confidence in their ability to manage any necessary long-term care costs.

Many middle-class seniors are forced to liquidate their assets to qualify for Medicaid or other long-term services and support due to the lack of viable alternatives to pay for the rising cost of long-term care. This can raise demand for and the price of the publicly funded insurance program. The majority of women (86%) agreed that more should be done by the federal government to assist citizens in obtaining high-quality long-term care when necessary.

There is disagreement among Americans on the authority of the government to withdraw funds from workers’ salaries to pay for long-term care, in an approach similar to Social Security and Medicare. One example of a state-run program is Washington State’s WA Cares program, which provides qualified participants with up to $36,500 for nursing care and other related services. The program is funded by a 0.58% payroll tax. Meanwhile, 87% of Americans think that Washington, D.C. authorities are unaware of the difficulties that employees encounter when trying to save for retirement. A majority (87%), indicate growing public anxiety about retirement security, and want legislators to give retirement-related problems a higher priority on their agenda.

Sources:

https://www.plansponsor.com/women-express-concern-about-retirement-crisis-long-term-care-costs/

https://www.gao.gov/blog/gender-pay-gap-and-its-effect-womens-retirement-savings

The financial professionals associated with LPL Financial may discuss and/or transact business only with residents of the states in which they are properly registered or licensed. No offers may be made or accepted from any resident of any other state.

111 Bedford Ct.
Deland, FL 3272

300 First Avenue South, Fifth Floor
St. Petersburg, FL 33701

685 Encino Drive
New Braunfels, Texas 78130

813-760-1769
PlanInsight@advizrs.com

Copyright © 2024
Advizrs